If you change lawyers, do you pay two attorney fees?

You want to leave the firm handling your injury case. Maybe the calls stopped coming back, maybe you have never spoken to the attorney whose name is on the sign, maybe you were pushed toward a number that felt wrong. And then the thought that stops you: if you hire someone new, do you end up paying two lawyers out of one settlement?

Tell us about your case

or call 1-866-568-4913

That fear keeps people in representation they have already lost confidence in. It is worth taking apart, because Florida law answers it directly, and the answer has been settled since 1982.

Will you pay two attorney fees if you switch lawyers in Florida?

No — not two full fees. Florida's rule is built specifically to stop that from happening. The Florida Supreme Court rejected the approach that would have allowed it, and said why in plain terms.

The case is Rosenberg v. Levin. The client, George Levin, had hired two lawyers under an agreement that paid them a $10,000 fixed fee plus half of anything recovered over $600,000. He discharged them, without cause, before the matter was resolved, then settled for a net $500,000. The discharged lawyers sued for the reasonable value of their work and a trial judge awarded them $55,000. The Third District Court of Appeal cut that to $10,000 — the most their own contract would ever have paid them. The Florida Supreme Court agreed with the district court and said the limit was the point:

"We hold that a lawyer discharged without cause is entitled to the reasonable value of his services on the basis of quantum meruit, but recovery is limited to the maximum fee set in the contract entered into for those services. We have concluded that without this limitation, the client would be penalized for the discharge and the lawyer would receive more than he bargained for in his initial contract."

Rosenberg v. Levin, 409 So. 2d 1016, 1017 (Fla. 1982)

Read what the court was protecting. Not the lawyer's expectations — the client's ability to leave. The opinion returns to that idea twice more, and the second time it names the exact outcome it refuses to allow:

"We approve the philosophy that there is an overriding need to allow clients freedom to substitute attorneys without economic penalty as a means of accomplishing the broad objective of fostering public confidence in the legal profession."

"We reject both the traditional contract rule and the quantum meruit rule that allow recovery in excess of the maximum contract price because both have a chilling effect on the client's power to discharge an attorney. Under the contract rule in a contingent fee situation, both the discharged attorney and the second attorney may receive a substantial percentage of the client's final recovery."

Rosenberg, 409 So. 2d at 1021

"Both the discharged attorney and the second attorney may receive a substantial percentage" is the two-fee scenario, described by the court that threw it out. Florida does not use the rule that produces it.

If your case does not recover anything, does your old lawyer still get paid?

No fee. In a contingency case, the discharged lawyer's claim for fees does not come into existence unless and until your case recovers money. The court adopted the California position on this and stated the consequence without softening it:

"We further follow the California view that in contingency fee cases, the cause of action for quantum meruit arises only upon the successful occurrence of the contingency. If the client fails in his recovery, the discharged attorney will similarly fail and recover nothing."

Rosenberg, 409 So. 2d at 1022

This matters more than it looks. It means the former firm is not a creditor sitting on your file waiting to bill you. Its fee claim is contingent on exactly the same thing yours is — a recovery. If nothing comes in, nothing is owed in fees.

Costs are a separate subject with a different answer, and the retainer you signed controls much of it. Costs are taken apart in case costs versus attorney fees.

How is the old firm's fee actually measured?

Not by multiplying its hours by an hourly rate. Florida tried that and the Supreme Court said it was the wrong method. In Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. Poletz, 652 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 1995), a trial court had valued a discharged firm's work using the "lodestar" calculation — reasonable hours times a reasonable rate — and arrived at $78,195. The Supreme Court quashed that decision, holding the lodestar method does not belong in this situation at all:

"Unlike an award of attorney's fees to a prevailing party, a quantum meruit award must take into account the actual value of the services to the client. Thus, while the time reasonably devoted to the representation and a reasonable hourly rate are factors to be considered in determining a proper quantum meruit award, the court must consider all relevant factors surrounding the professional relationship to ensure that the award is fair to both the attorney and client."

Searcy, Denney, 652 So. 2d at 369

The court then listed things a judge may weigh, and the list is worth reading closely if you are the client:

"For example, the fee agreement itself, the reason the attorney was discharged, actions taken by the attorney or client before or after discharge, and the benefit actually conferred on the client may be relevant to that determination."

Searcy, Denney, 652 So. 2d at 369

Three of those four can cut against the firm you are leaving. The reason you discharged it is a factor. What it did after the discharge is a factor. Whether its work actually benefited you — not whether it was busy — is a factor.

The opinion goes further in a footnote that almost nobody quotes. In that case the discharged firm had refused to give the client's file to the new firm and had told its experts not to speak to successor counsel. The court noted that this behavior "may affect the value of the services rendered to the client," pointing to an earlier decision holding that a trial court should consider a firm's failure to turn over the file and whether that refusal hurt the client by forcing new counsel to duplicate work. See Searcy, Denney, 652 So. 2d at 369 n.5.

In other words: a firm that obstructs the handoff can reduce what its own work is worth. That is the opposite of the leverage people assume a departing firm holds.

One honest limit. Because the valuation turns on the totality of the circumstances, the Searcy court also said that which factors matter, how much weight each gets, and the final number "are matters within the sound discretion of the trial court." There is no formula that produces a figure in advance. What is fixed is the ceiling from Rosenberg and the condition that there be a recovery at all.

How do two law firms divide one contingency fee?

When two firms in different offices share responsibility for one case, Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(D) sets the split: a minimum of 75 percent of the total fee to the lawyer with primary responsibility, and a maximum of 25 percent to the lawyer with secondary responsibility. The rule adds that "[a]ny fee in excess of 25% will be presumed to be clearly excessive."

There is one route past the 25 percent limit, and it is not a private arrangement between the two firms. Under Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(D)(iii), the limit does not apply where two or more lawyers or firms accept "substantially equal active participation" in providing the legal services — and in that situation counsel must apply to the court for authorization of the larger division, on a sworn petition signed by all counsel that discloses in detail the services to be performed. The application must carry a certificate showing it was served on the client, and if the court denies it, a copy of the petition and the order must be served on The Florida Bar.

Note what that gives you: if two firms want more than the standard split, a judge has to approve it and you have to be served with the request. How two firms divide one contingency fee walks through the mechanics and the timing.

Now the distinction competitors blur. A negotiated division of fees between two firms and a discharged firm's quantum meruit claim are two different legal paths, and they do not work the same way. The 75/25 rule governs a division of a fee where lawyers in different firms share the representation. Rosenberg governs what a firm you fired can recover. Sometimes the two firms resolve it by agreeing on a division; sometimes the departing firm asserts a claim and a court values it. Pages that tell you "the fee is split between them, they work it out" are describing one of those paths and calling it the law.

What the arithmetic looks like

These figures are an illustration with round numbers, chosen to show how the structure works. They are not a case result, they do not come from any firm's file, and nothing here predicts what any particular claim is worth or what any particular firm would receive.

Assume a case that settles for $300,000 before an answer is filed, under a contingency agreement at 33 1/3 percent — the standard tier in Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(B)(i) for that stage. Assume $12,000 in case costs advanced, and set aside medical liens, which are their own subject.

The row that matters is the last one. The fee is a pool, and a change of counsel is a question about who is paid from the pool, not a second pool.

Compare it with the arrangement Rosenberg rejected. If the first firm could enforce its full contract percentage and the second firm charged its own, the two together would take roughly 66 2/3 percent of a $300,000 settlement — about $200,000 in fees, leaving you under $90,000 after costs. That is the result the Florida Supreme Court called a "chilling effect on the client's power to discharge an attorney," and it is not Florida law.

The three business days almost nobody tells you about

If you signed your contingency fee contract within the last three business days, you can cancel it in writing for no reason at all and owe no attorney fee. This comes from the Statement of Client's Rights for Contingency Fees, the document your lawyer was required to give you and you were required to sign before the contract was signed. Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(C) requires it, and item 2 of the Statement says:

"Any contingent fee contract must be in writing and you have 3 business days to reconsider the contract. You may cancel the contract without any reason if you notify your lawyer in writing within 3 business days of signing the contract. If you withdraw from the contract within the first 3 business days, you do not owe the lawyer a fee although you may be responsible for the lawyer's actual costs during that time."

Statement of Client's Rights for Contingency Fees, item 2, as printed in R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-1.5(f)(4)(C)

Two details inside that passage. The notice has to be in writing. And costs are carved out — you may still owe what the lawyer actually spent during those days.

If you are reading this in the first week after signing with a firm, the date on your contract is the first thing to find. After that window the analysis changes, which is the next section.

What "without cause" means, and why it changes the money

Rosenberg's holding is written for a specific situation: a lawyer "discharged without cause." That phrasing is doing work, and being straight about it is more useful than pretending it is not there.

Item 2 of the Statement of Client's Rights puts the other side of it in the client's own copy: "If you discharge your lawyer without good cause after the 3-day period, you may have to pay a fee for work the lawyer has done." The same item also describes what the lawyer owes you if the lawyer is the one leaving — notice, delivery of necessary papers, and time to employ another lawyer, with court approval often required first.

Whether a particular discharge was for cause is a fact question, and it is frequently contested. A firm that ignored you for eight months and a firm you simply lost confidence in are not obviously in the same position, and neither this page nor any page can tell you which description fits your case. What a page can tell you is that the question exists, that it affects the number, and that it is one of the first things a new firm will want to look at — along with the reason for discharge being an express factor in the Searcy valuation.

Relatedly, a lawyer who leaves on their own is in a different position from one the client fires — and the difference runs the other way from what people expect. Where an attorney withdraws voluntarily and the contingency has not happened, the Florida Supreme Court held that "the attorney forfeits all rights to compensation," subject to a narrow exception where the client's own conduct made continued representation legally impossible or would have forced the attorney to violate an ethical rule. Faro v. Romani, 641 So. 2d 69, 71 (Fla. 1994). That is a different question from the one this page answers, and it has its own answer.

Case costs are not attorney fees

This page has been about fees — the percentage. Costs are the money spent to build the case: filing fees, records, deposition transcripts, expert charges, investigators, mediation. They are governed by your contract, not by the contingency percentage, and they are where the genuine surprises live when a case changes hands.

Your own signed Statement gives you two rights worth exercising before you make any decision. Item 6: the right to know in advance how you will need to pay the expenses and the legal fees at the end of the case, to ask reasonable questions about how a cost deposit was spent and how much remains, to a reasonable estimate of future necessary costs, and to be told whether the fee is calculated on the gross recovery or on the amount after costs. Item 7: the right to be told about possible adverse consequences if you lose, which may include money you have to pay your lawyer for costs.

Read your retainer's termination paragraph and its costs paragraph before you talk to anyone. Case costs versus attorney fees takes this apart clause by clause.

The document that shows you exactly what each lawyer was paid

At the end of a contingency case in Florida, you receive and approve a closing statement, and it has to itemize what every lawyer got. Rule 4-1.5(f)(5) requires that, where there is a recovery, the lawyer prepare a closing statement "reflecting an itemization of all costs and expenses, together with the amount of fee received by each participating lawyer or law firm." Every participating lawyer signs it, you sign it, and each of you gets a copy. Each firm keeps it for six years, and it has to be available for your inspection at reasonable times.

Item 8 of the Statement of Client's Rights adds the part with teeth: you have the right to receive and approve the closing statement before you pay any money, it must list all of the financial details of the entire case including the amount recovered, all expenses, and a precise statement of your lawyer's fee, and "[u]ntil you approve the closing statement your lawyer cannot pay any money to anyone, including you, without an appropriate order of the court." You also have the right to have every lawyer or firm that worked on your case sign it.

So the answer to "how will I know I was not charged twice" is not trust. It is a document you have the right to read and approve, that names each firm and each figure, before anything is disbursed.

What to ask the next firm before you sign anything

These are the questions that settle the fee issue in writing instead of leaving it to assumption. A firm that handles substitutions regularly will have ready answers.

1. Will my total attorney fee be higher than the percentage in your agreement because of the prior firm's claim — and will the agreement say so? Firms handle this differently. The answer belongs in the document you sign, not in a conversation.
2. Who deals with the prior firm — your office or me? Find out whether you are expected to negotiate with the firm you just left.
3. What happens to the costs the first firm already advanced? Whether they are repaid from the recovery, carried by the new firm, or remain your obligation under the old contract.
4. Am I still inside the three business days? If you signed very recently, that changes what follows.
5. What will my closing statement show? Ask for the categories you will see, so the end of the case holds no surprises.

What is genuinely uncertain here

A page that gave you only reassurance would be less useful. These parts are not settled by a formula:

• The amount of a discharged firm's claim. Searcy leaves which factors apply, their weight and the final figure to the trial court's discretion. The ceiling is known; the number is not.
• Whether a discharge was for cause. Fact-dependent and often disputed, and it feeds directly into the valuation.
• What your own contract says. Contingency agreements are not uniform. The termination and costs clauses in your contract govern a great deal of this, and nobody can tell you what they say without reading them.
• How much the prior firm's claim comes to. What the claim attaches to is settled: an attorney's charging lien is "an equitable right to have costs and fees due an attorney for services in the suit secured to him in the judgment or recovery in that particular suit" — Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So. 2d 1383, 1384 (Fla. 1983). It reaches the recovery in your case, not your house, your wages or your bank account. The amount is the open part, and it is open in the ordinary way: a trial court weighing the Searcy factors, with the contract fee as the ceiling.

Reading your own paperwork before you decide

Three documents answer most of this, and you should already have all three.

• The contingency fee contract. The percentage, the stage tiers, the costs clause, the termination clause.
• The Statement of Client's Rights you signed. Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(C) required a copy "signed by both the client and the lawyer" to be given to you to keep. If you cannot find it, the full text is printed in the rule.
• Any amended contract adding a second firm. Items 4 and 5 of the Statement say a lawyer must tell you at the outset whether other lawyers will help, that you should sign a new contract if the case is later referred or associated out, and that where lawyers from different firms represent you, at least one lawyer from each firm must sign the contract.

If a second firm appeared on your case and you never signed anything adding it, that is worth asking about.

Where to go from here

• Can you change attorneys in the middle of a Florida injury case? — the right itself, and where it comes from.
• How two law firms divide one contingency fee — the 75/25 rule and the court-approval route.
• Case costs versus attorney fees — the part that actually surprises people.
• How to change injury lawyers, step by step — what happens, in what order.
• When switching lawyers is the wrong move — including the cases where silence is normal.

Cases this covers

Participating firms handle Florida injury claims. If your case is one of these and it is already with another attorney, it is the kind of case this service was built for.

• Car accidents
• Truck accidents
• Motorcycle accidents
• Rideshare accidents
• Slip and fall
• Pedestrian and bicycle
• Dog bites
• Wrongful death

How this works